«статус конвенции организации объединенных наций о юрисдикционных иммунитетах государств и их собственности (нью-йорк, 2 декабря 2004 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 16.09.2010)

(неофициальный перевод)

СТАТУС КОНВЕНЦИИ

ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ОБЪЕДИНЕННЫХ НАЦИЙ О ЮРИСДИКЦИОННЫХ

ИММУНИТЕТАХ ГОСУДАРСТВ И ИХ СОБСТВЕННОСТИ

(НЬЮ-ЙОРК, 2 ДЕКАБРЯ 2004 ГОДА)

(по состоянию на 16 сентября 2010 года)

Не вступил в силу.

---------------------------------------------T----------T-----------------¬

¦ Участник ¦Подписание¦ Ратификация, ¦

¦ ¦ ¦ Принятие (A), ¦

¦ ¦ ¦ Одобрение (AA), ¦

¦ ¦ ¦Присоединение (a)¦

+--------------------------------------------+----------+-----------------+

¦Австрия ¦17.01.2005¦14.09.2006 ¦

¦Бельгия ¦22.04.2005¦ ¦

¦Дания ¦19.09.2006¦ ¦

¦Индия ¦12.01.2007¦ ¦

¦Иран (Исламская Республика)¦17.01.2007¦29.09.2008 ¦

¦Исландия ¦16.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Казахстан ¦ ¦17.02.2010 a ¦

¦Китай ¦14.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Ливан ¦11.11.2005¦21.11.2008 ¦

¦Мадагаскар ¦15.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Марокко ¦17.01.2005¦ ¦

¦Мексика ¦25.09.2006¦ ¦

¦Норвегия¦08.07.2005¦27.03.2006 ¦

¦Парагвай ¦16.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Португалия ¦25.02.2005¦14.09.2006 ¦

¦Российская Федерация ¦01.12.2006¦ ¦

¦Румыния ¦14.09.2005¦15.02.2007 ¦

¦Сенегал ¦21.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Словакия ¦15.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Соединенное Королевство Великобритании и ¦30.09.2005¦ ¦

¦ Северной Ирландии ¦ ¦ ¦

¦Сьерра-Леоне ¦21.09.2006¦ ¦

¦Тимор-Лешти ¦16.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Финляндия ¦14.09.2005¦ ¦

¦Франция ¦17.01.2007¦ ¦

¦Чешская Республика ¦13.10.2006¦ ¦

¦Швейцария¦19.09.2006¦16.04.2010 ¦

¦Швеция¦14.09.2005¦23.12.2009 ¦

¦Эстония ¦30.03.2006¦ ¦

¦Япония ¦11.01.2007¦11.05.2010 A ¦

L--------------------------------------------+----------+------------------

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION

ON JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF STATES AND THEIR PROPERTY

New York, 2 December 2004

Status as at: 16-09-2010

Not yet in force: in accordance with article 30 which reads as follows: "1. The present Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following the date of deposit of the thirtieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. 2. For each State ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to the present Convention after the deposit of the thirtieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession."

Status: Signatories: 28. Parties: 10

Text: Doc. A/59/508; depositary notification C.N.141.2005.TREATIES-4 of 28 February 2005 [Proposal of corrections to the original text of the Convention (Chinese version)] and C.N.419.2005.TREATIES-6 of 31 May 2005 [Corrections to the original text of the Convention (Chinese version)]; C.N.359.2008.TREATIES-1 of 6 May 2008 (Proposal of corrections to the original text of the Convention (Arabic text) and to the Certified True Copies) and C.N.556.2008.TREATIES-2 of 21 August 2008 (corrections).

Note: The above Convention was adopted during the 65th plenary meeting of the General Assembly by resolution A/59/38 of 2 December 2004. In accordance with its articles 28 and 33, the Convention shall be open for signature by all States from 17 January 2005 until 17 January 2007, at United Nations Headquarters in New York.

---------------------------------------------T-----------T----------------¬

¦ Participant ¦ Signature ¦ Ratification, ¦

¦ ¦ ¦Acceptance (A), ¦

¦ ¦ ¦ Approval (AA), ¦

¦ ¦ ¦ Accession (a) ¦

+--------------------------------------------+-----------+----------------+

¦Austria ¦17 Jan 2005¦14 Sep 2006 ¦

¦Belgium ¦22 Apr 2005¦ ¦

¦China ¦14 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦Czech Republic ¦13 Oct 2006¦ ¦

¦Denmark ¦19 Sep 2006¦ ¦

¦Estonia ¦30 Mar 2006¦ ¦

¦Finland ¦14 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦France ¦17 Jan 2007¦ ¦

¦Iceland ¦16 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦India ¦12 Jan 2007¦ ¦

¦Iran (Islamic Republic of)¦17 Jan 2007¦29 Sep 2008 ¦

¦Japan ¦11 Jan 2007¦11 May 2010 A ¦

¦Kazakhstan ¦ ¦17 Feb 2010 a ¦

¦Lebanon ¦11 Nov 2005¦21 Nov 2008 ¦

¦Madagascar ¦15 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦Mexico ¦25 Sep 2006¦ ¦

¦Morocco ¦17 Jan 2005¦ ¦

¦Norway¦ 8 Jul 2005¦27 Mar 2006 ¦

¦Paraguay ¦16 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦Portugal ¦25 Feb 2005¦14 Sep 2006 ¦

¦Romania ¦14 Sep 2005¦15 Feb 2007 ¦

¦Russian Federation ¦ 1 Dec 2006¦ ¦

¦Senegal ¦21 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦Sierra Leone ¦21 Sep 2006¦ ¦

¦Slovakia ¦15 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦Sweden¦14 Sep 2005¦23 Dec 2009 ¦

¦Switzerland¦19 Sep 2006¦16 Apr 2010 ¦

¦Timor-Leste ¦16 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦United Kingdom of Great Britain and ¦30 Sep 2005¦ ¦

¦ Northern Ireland ¦ ¦ ¦

L--------------------------------------------+-----------+-----------------

DECLARATIONS AND RESERVATIONS

(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations

and reservations were made upon ratification,

acceptance, approval or accession.)

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Reservation:

"Pursuant to Article 27, paragraph 3 of the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 2 of the Convention. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran affirms that the consent of all parties to such a dispute is necessary, in each individual case, for the submission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran can, if it deems appropriate, for the settlement of such a dispute, agree with the submission of the dispute to arbitration in accordance with its related domestic law."

Norway

Declaration:

"Recalling inter alia resolution 59/38 adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 2 December 2004, in which the General Assembly took into account, when adopting the Convention, the statement of 25 October 2004 of the Chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property introducing the Committee"s report, Norway hereby states its understanding that the Convention does not apply to military activities, including the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, and activities undertaken by military forces of a State in the exercise of their official duties. Such activities remain subject to other rules of international law. Similarly, as also noted in the said statement, the Convention does not apply where there is a special immunity regime, including immunities ratione personae. Thus, the express mention of heads of State in Article 3 should not be read as suggesting that the immunity ratione personae of other State officials is affected by the Convention.

Furthermore, in cases where it has been established that property of a State is specifically in use or intended for use by the State for other than government non-commercial purposes and is in the territory of the State of the forum, it is the understanding of Norway that Article 18 does not prevent pre-judgment measures of constraint from being taken against property that has a connection with the entity against which the proceeding was directed.

Finally, Norway understands that the Convention is without prejudice to any future international development in the protection of human rights."

Sweden

Declarations:

"Recalling inter alia resolution 59/38, adopted by the General Assembly on 16 December 2004, taking into account inter alia the statement of the Chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee introducing the report of the Ad Hoc Committee to the General Assembly, as well as the report of the Ad Hoc Committee, Sweden hereby declares its understanding that the Convention does not apply to military activities, including the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, and activities undertaken by military forces of a State in the exercise of their official functions.

Sweden also declares its understanding that the express mention of heads of State in article 3 should not be read as suggesting that the immunity ratione personae which other State officials might enjoy under international law is affected by the Convention.

Sweden furthermore declares its understanding that the Convention is without prejudice to any future international legal development concerning the protection of human rights."

Switzerland

General interpretative declaration:

In accordance with General Assembly resolution 59/38, adopted on 2 December 2004, Switzerland hereby understands that the Convention does not cover criminal proceedings;

Interpretative declaration concerning article 12:

Switzerland considers that article 12 does not govern the question of pecuniary compensation for serious human rights violations which are alleged to be attributable to a State and are committed outside the State of the forum. Consequently, this Convention is without prejudice to developments in international law in this regard;

Interpretative declaration concerning article 22, paragraph 3:

If the State concerned is a Swiss canton, Switzerland considers that "official language" should be understood as the official language or one of the official languages of the canton in which process is to be served.