(неофициальный перевод)
СТАТУС МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЙ КОНВЕНЦИИ
О БОРЬБЕ С АКТАМИ ЯДЕРНОГО ТЕРРОРИЗМА
(НЬЮ-ЙОРК, 13 АПРЕЛЯ 2005 ГОДА)
(по состоянию на 15 мая 2009 года)
Вступление в силу: 07.07.2007
----------------------------------------T--------------T------------------¬
¦ Участник ¦ Подписание, ¦ Одобрение (AA), ¦
¦ ¦Правопреемство¦ Принятие (A), ¦
¦ ¦подписания (d)¦Присоединение (a),¦
¦ ¦ ¦ Ратификация ¦
+---------------------------------------+--------------+------------------+
¦Австралия ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Австрия ¦15.09.2005 ¦14.09.2006 ¦
¦Азербайджан
¦Албания ¦23.11.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Андорра ¦11.05.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Аргентина
¦Армения ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Афганистан ¦29.12.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Бангладеш
¦Беларусь ¦15.09.2005 ¦13.03.2007 ¦
¦Бельгия ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Бенин ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Болгария ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Босния и Герцеговина ¦07.12.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Бразилия ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Буркина-Фасо ¦21.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Бурунди ¦29.03.2006 ¦24.09.2008 ¦
¦Бывшая югославская Республика Македония¦16.09.2005 ¦19.03.2007 ¦
¦Венгрия ¦14.09.2005 ¦12.04.2007 ¦
¦Габон ¦15.09.2005 ¦01.10.2007 ¦
¦Гайана ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Гана ¦06.11.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Гватемала ¦20.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Гвинея ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Гвинея-Бисау ¦ ¦06.08.2008 a ¦
¦Германия ¦15.09.2005 ¦08.02.2008 ¦
¦Греция ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Дания<1>¦14.09.2005 ¦20.03.2007 ¦
¦Джибути ¦14.06.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Доминиканская Республика ¦ ¦11.06.2008 a ¦
¦Египет ¦20.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Израиль ¦27.12.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Индия
¦Иордания ¦16.11.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Ирландия ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Исландия ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Испания ¦14.09.2005 ¦22.02.2007 ¦
¦Италия ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Казахстан ¦16.09.2005 ¦31.07.2008 ¦
¦Камбоджа ¦07.12.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Канада ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Катар
¦Кения ¦15.09.2005 ¦13.04.2006 ¦
¦Кипр ¦15.09.2005 ¦28.01.2008 ¦
¦Кирибати ¦15.09.2005 ¦26.09.2008 ¦
¦Китай ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Колумбия ¦01.11.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Коморские Острова ¦ ¦12.03.2007 a ¦
¦Коста-Рика ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Кувейт ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Кыргызстан ¦05.05.2006 ¦02.10.2007 ¦
¦Латвия ¦16.09.2005 ¦25.07.2006 ¦
¦Лесото ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Либерия ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Ливан ¦23.09.2005 ¦13.11.2006 ¦
¦Ливийская Арабская Джамахирия ¦16.09.2005 ¦22.12.2008 ¦
¦Литва ¦16.09.2005 ¦19.07.2007 ¦
¦Лихтенштейн ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Люксембург ¦15.09.2005 ¦02.10.2008 ¦
¦Маврикий ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Мавритания ¦ ¦28.04.2008 a ¦
¦Мадагаскар ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Малайзия ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Мальта ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Марокко ¦19.04.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Мексика ¦12.01.2006 ¦27.06.2006 ¦
¦Мозамбик ¦01.05.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Монако ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Монголия ¦03.11.2005 ¦06.10.2006 ¦
¦Нигер ¦ ¦02.07.2008 a ¦
¦Нидерланды ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Никарагуа ¦15.09.2005 ¦25.02.2009 ¦
¦Новая Зеландия ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Норвегия ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Объединенные Арабские Эмираты
¦Палау ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Панама ¦21.02.2006 ¦21.06.2007 ¦
¦Парагвай ¦16.09.2005 ¦29.01.2009 ¦
¦Перу ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Польша ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Португалия ¦21.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Республика Корея ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Республика Молдова
¦Российская Федерация
¦Руанда ¦06.03.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Румыния ¦14.09.2005 ¦24.01.2007 ¦
¦Сальвадор
¦Сан-Томе и Принсипи ¦19.12.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Саудовская Аравия
¦Свазиленд ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Сейшельские Острова ¦07.10.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Сенегал ¦21.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Сербия ¦15.09.2005 ¦26.09.2006 ¦
¦Сингапур ¦01.12.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Сирийская Арабская Республика ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Словакия ¦15.09.2005 ¦23.03.2006 ¦
¦Словения ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Соединенное Королевство Великобритании ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦ и Северной Ирландии ¦ ¦ ¦
¦Соединенные Штаты Америки ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Сьерра-Леоне ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Таджикистан ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Таиланд ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Тимор-Лешти ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Того ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Туркменистан ¦ ¦28.03.2008 a ¦
¦Турция ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Узбекистан
¦Украина ¦14.09.2005 ¦25.09.2007 ¦
¦Уругвай ¦16.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Фиджи ¦ ¦15.05.2008 a ¦
¦Филиппины ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Финляндия ¦14.09.2005 ¦13.01.2009 A ¦
¦Франция ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Хорватия ¦16.09.2005 ¦30.05.2007 ¦
¦Центральноафриканская Республика ¦ ¦19.02.2008 a ¦
¦Черногория<2>¦23.10.2006 d ¦ ¦
¦Чешская Республика ¦15.09.2005 ¦25.07.2006 ¦
¦Чили ¦22.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Швейцария ¦14.09.2005 ¦15.10.2008 ¦
¦Швеция ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Шри-Ланка ¦14.09.2005 ¦27.09.2007 ¦
¦Эквадор ¦15.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Эстония ¦14.09.2005 ¦ ¦
¦Южная Африка ¦14.09.2005 ¦09.05.2007 ¦
¦Ямайка ¦05.12.2006 ¦ ¦
¦Япония ¦15.09.2005 ¦03.08.2007 A ¦
L---------------------------------------+--------------+-------------------
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION
FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF ACTS OF NUCLEAR TERRORISM
New York, 13 April 2005
Status as at: 15-05-2009
Entry into force: 7 July 2007, in accordance with article 25(1) which reads as follows: "1. This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following the date of the deposit of the twenty-second instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. 2. For each State ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to the Convention after the deposit of the twenty-second instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval, acceptance or accession, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession."
Registration: 7 July 2007, No. 44004
Status: Signatories: 115. Parties: 52
Text: A/RES/59/290.
Note: The above Convention was adopted on 13 April 2005 during the 91st plenary meeting of the General Assembly by resolution A/RES/59/290. In accordance with its article 24, the Convention shall be open for signature by all States from 14 September 2005 until 31 December 2006 at United Nations Headquarters in New York.
--------------------------------------------T-------------T---------------¬
¦ Participant ¦ Signature, ¦Approval (AA), ¦
¦ ¦Succession to¦Acceptance (A),¦
¦ ¦signature (d)¦Accession (a), ¦
¦ ¦ ¦ Ratification ¦
+-------------------------------------------+-------------+---------------+
¦Afghanistan ¦29 Dec 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Albania ¦23 Nov 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Andorra ¦11 May 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Argentina
¦Armenia ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Australia ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Austria ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦14 Sep 2006 ¦
¦Azerbaijan
¦Bangladesh
¦Belarus ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦13 Mar 2007 ¦
¦Belgium ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Benin ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Bosnia and Herzegovina ¦ 7 Dec 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Brazil ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Bulgaria ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Burkina Faso ¦21 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Burundi ¦29 Mar 2006 ¦24 Sep 2008 ¦
¦Cambodia ¦ 7 Dec 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Canada ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Central African Republic ¦ ¦19 Feb 2008 a ¦
¦Chile ¦22 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦China ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Colombia ¦ 1 Nov 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Comoros ¦ ¦12 Mar 2007 a ¦
¦Costa Rica ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Croatia ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦30 May 2007 ¦
¦Cyprus ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦28 Jan 2008 ¦
¦Czech Republic ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦25 Jul 2006 ¦
¦Denmark<1>¦14 Sep 2005 ¦20 Mar 2007 ¦
¦Djibouti ¦14 Jun 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Dominican Republic ¦ ¦11 Jun 2008 a ¦
¦Ecuador ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Egypt ¦20 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦El Salvador
¦Estonia ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Fiji ¦ ¦15 May 2008 a ¦
¦Finland ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦13 Jan 2009 A ¦
¦France ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Gabon ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ 1 Oct 2007 ¦
¦Germany ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ 8 Feb 2008 ¦
¦Ghana ¦ 6 Nov 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Greece ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Guatemala ¦20 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Guinea ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Guinea-Bissau ¦ ¦ 6 Aug 2008 a ¦
¦Guyana ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Hungary ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦12 Apr 2007 ¦
¦Iceland ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦India
¦Ireland ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Israel ¦27 Dec 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Italy ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Jamaica ¦ 5 Dec 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Japan ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ 3 Aug 2007 A ¦
¦Jordan ¦16 Nov 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Kazakhstan ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦31 Jul 2008 ¦
¦Kenya ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦13 Apr 2006 ¦
¦Kiribati ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦26 Sep 2008 ¦
¦Kuwait ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Kyrgyzstan ¦ 5 May 2006 ¦ 2 Oct 2007 ¦
¦Latvia ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦25 Jul 2006 ¦
¦Lebanon ¦23 Sep 2005 ¦13 Nov 2006 ¦
¦Lesotho ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Liberia ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Libyan Arab Jamahiriya ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦22 Dec 2008 ¦
¦Liechtenstein ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Lithuania ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦19 Jul 2007 ¦
¦Luxembourg ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ 2 Oct 2008 ¦
¦Madagascar ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Malaysia ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Malta ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Mauritania ¦ ¦28 Apr 2008 a ¦
¦Mauritius ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Mexico ¦12 Jan 2006 ¦27 Jun 2006 ¦
¦Monaco ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Mongolia ¦ 3 Nov 2005 ¦ 6 Oct 2006 ¦
¦Montenegro<2>¦23 Oct 2006 d¦ ¦
¦Morocco ¦19 Apr 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Mozambique ¦ 1 May 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Netherlands ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦New Zealand ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Nicaragua ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦25 Feb 2009 ¦
¦Niger ¦ ¦ 2 Jul 2008 a ¦
¦Norway ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Palau ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Panama ¦21 Feb 2006 ¦21 Jun 2007 ¦
¦Paraguay ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦29 Jan 2009 ¦
¦Peru ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Philippines ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Poland ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Portugal ¦21 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Qatar
¦Republic of Korea ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Republic of Moldova
¦Romania ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦24 Jan 2007 ¦
¦Russian Federation
¦Rwanda ¦ 6 Mar 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Sao Tome and Principe ¦19 Dec 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Saudi Arabia
¦Senegal ¦21 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Serbia ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦26 Sep 2006 ¦
¦Seychelles ¦ 7 Oct 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Sierra Leone ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Singapore ¦ 1 Dec 2006 ¦ ¦
¦Slovakia ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦23 Mar 2006 ¦
¦Slovenia ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦South Africa ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ 9 May 2007 ¦
¦Spain ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦22 Feb 2007 ¦
¦Sri Lanka ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦27 Sep 2007 ¦
¦Swaziland ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Sweden ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Switzerland ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦15 Oct 2008 ¦
¦Syrian Arab Republic ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Tajikistan ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Thailand ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦19 Mar 2007 ¦
¦Timor-Leste ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Togo ¦15 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Turkey ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Turkmenistan ¦ ¦28 Mar 2008 a ¦
¦Ukraine ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦25 Sep 2007 ¦
¦United Arab Emirates
¦United Kingdom of Great Britain and ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦ Northern Ireland ¦ ¦ ¦
¦United States of America ¦14 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Uruguay ¦16 Sep 2005 ¦ ¦
¦Uzbekistan
L-------------------------------------------+-------------+----------------
DECLARATIONS AND RESERVATIONS
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations
and reservations were made upon ratification,
acceptance, approval or accession.)
Argentina
Reservation made upon signature:
Pursuant to article 23, paragraph 2, the Republic of Argentina declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of article 23 and, as a consequence, does not recognize either the compulsory arbitration or the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
Azerbaijan
Reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
"In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 23, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of Article 23 of the Convention."
Declaration made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
"The Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it will be unable to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the Convention in its territories occupied by the Republic of Armenia until these territories are liberated from that occupation."
Bangladesh
Reservation:
"Pursuant to Article 23, paragraph 2 of the Convention, [the] People"s Republic of Bangladesh does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 23, paragraph 1 of the Convention."
Egypt<3>
Reservation made upon signature:
1. The Arab Republic of Egypt declares its commitment to article 4 of the Convention provided that the armed forces of a State do not violate the rules and principles of international law in the exercise of their duties under that article, and also provided that the article is not interpreted as excluding the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict from the scope of application of this Convention on the grounds that the activities of States - under certain legal circumstances - are not considered terrorist activities.
2. The Arab Republic of Egypt declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of article 23 of the Convention.
El Salvador
Reservations:
With reference to article 13 of this Convention, the Government of the Republic of El Salvador does not consider itself bound by the provisions of this article because it does not consider the Convention to be a legal basis for cooperation in extradition matters. Similarly, with reference to article 23 of the Convention, the Government of the Republic of El Salvador does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article because it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
India
Reservation:
"India does not consider itself bound by the provision of Paragraph (1) of Article 23."
Qatar
Upon signature:
Reservation:
"... with reservation on the provisions of paragraph (1) of article 23 of the Convention."
Republic of Moldova
Upon ratification
Declaration:
"Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Convention will be applied only on the territory controlled effectively by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova."
Russian Federation
Declaration:
The position of the Russian Federation is that the provisions of article 16 of the Convention should be implemented in such a way as to ensure the inevitability of responsibility for the commission of offences falling within the scope of the Convention, without detriment to the effectiveness of international cooperation on the questions of extradition and legal assistance.
Saudi Arabia
Reservation:
The Kingdom hereby declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 23, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
Turkey<4>
Upon signature:
Declaration:
"It is the understanding of the Republic of Turkey that the term international humanitarian law in Article 4(2) of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, refers to the legal instruments to which Turkey is already party to. The Article should not be interpreted as giving a different status to the armed forces and groups other than the armed forces of a state as currently understood and applied in international law and thereby creating new obligations for the Republic of Turkey."
Reservation:
"Pursuant to Article 23 (2) of the Convention, the Government of the Republic of Turkey declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 23(1) of the Convention.
United Arab Emirates
Reservation:
...the United Arab Emirates, having considered the text of the aforementioned Convention and approved the contents thereof, formally declares its accession to the Convention, subject to a reservation with regard to Article 23, paragraph 1 in respect of arbitration. The United Arab Emirates therefore does not consider itself bound by Article 23, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
Uzbekistan
Declaration
Article 16 of the Convention:
The Republic of Uzbekistan proceeds from the fact that the provisions of Article 16 of the Convention should be applied in such a way as to ensure the inevitability of responsibility for the crimes falling within the scope of the Convention, without prejudice to the effectiveness of international cooperation on extradition and legal assistance;
Paragraph 2 of Article 23 of the Convention:
The Republic of Uzbekistan declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 23 of the Convention."
Notifications made pursuant to article 9 (3)
(Unless otherwise indicated, the notifications were made upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.)
Belarus
The Republic of Belarus establishes its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in article 2 in cases envisaged in paragraph 2 of article 9 of the Convention.
Czech Republic
"In accordance with article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Czech Republic notifies that it has established its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in article 2 of the Convention in cases referred to in article 9, subparagraph 2 (c) and 2 (d) of the Convention."
Germany
"...with reference to Article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention,... the Federal Republic of Germany [makes] the following declaration:
German criminal law may be applicable in the situations specified in article 9, paragraph 2.
1. Article 9, paragraph 2 (a)
Whether German criminal law is applicable depends on the specific circumstances of the individual case.
If offences under the Convention are committed against a German national abroad, German criminal law is applicable in accordance with section 7 (1) of the Criminal Code, provided the act is punishable at the place of its commission or the place of its commission is not subject to any criminal jurisdiction.
If the objective or result of the offence is a relevant act within German territory, section 9 of the Criminal Code may be applicable in certain cases. Pursuant to subsection (1) of section 9, German criminal law is applicable if the perpetrator acted in Germany, or if the result of his action is an element of the offence and occurs on German territory or should occur there according to his understanding. Pursuant to subsection (2), acts committed abroad by an accessory may also be covered if the principal act was committed in Germany or should have been committed there according to the accessory"s understanding.
2. Article 9, paragraph 2 (b)
Here, too, whether German criminal law is applicable depends on the specific circumstances of the individual case. German law may be applicable if one of the special circumstances mentioned above with respect to subparagraph (a) or below with respect to subparagraph (c) or (d) is given. In addition to those cases, German criminal law may also be applicable pursuant to section 6, paragraph 9 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, of 14 December 1973.
3. Article 9, paragraph 2 (c)
German criminal law is applicable pursuant to section 7 (2) paragraph 2, regardless of the habitual residence of the stateless person, if he/she is found to be in Germany and the act is punishable at the place of its commission or is not subject to any criminal jurisdiction, if the perpetrator has not been extradited although the Extradition Act would permit extradition for such an act, because a request for extradition was not made within a reasonable period, has been rejected, or the extradition is not practicable. German criminal jurisdiction is thus excluded for various types of offences, in particular, minor offences, political offences and military offences (sections 3 (2), 6 and 7 of the Act on International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters respectively). Stateless persons are foreigners within the meaning of section 7 (2) 2 of the Criminal Code.
4. Article 9, paragraph 2 (d)
German criminal law is applicable pursuant to section 9 (1) of the Criminal Code, if the compulsion is part of the result of the act, and such result is an element of the crime.
5. Article 9, paragraph 2 (e)
Pursuant to section 4 of the Criminal Code, German criminal law is applicable to acts committed in an aircraft which is entitled to fly the federal flag or the national insignia of the Federal Republic of Germany (see also article 9, paragraph 1 (b), of the Convention)."
Hungary
"...the Republic of Hungary establishes its jurisdiction in cases mentioned in Article 9 (2) (b) and (e) of the Convention."
Japan
3 August 2007
"In accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 9 of the Convention, Japan hereby also notifies... that, in accordance with paragraph 2 (2) and (3) of Article 3 of Panel Code of Japan, it has established its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 2 of the Convention in the case specified in paragraph 2 (a) of Article 9 provided that such offences constitute murder, attempted murder, bodily injury and bodily injury resulting in death to Japanese nationals."
Latvia
"In accordance with paragraph 3 of the Article 9 of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia notifies that it has established its jurisdiction over all the offences enumerated in the paragraph 2 of the Article 9 of the Convention."
Lithuania
19 July 2007
"...WHEREAS, it is provided in paragraph 3 of Article 9 of the Convention, the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania declares that the Republic of Lithuania establishes its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 2 of the Convention in all cases specified in paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the Convention."
Republic of Moldova
"According to the Article 9 paragraph (3) of the Convention: the Republic of Moldova declares that the offences specified in the Article 2 of the Convention are going to be under its own jurisdiction in cases mentioned in the Article 9 paragraph (2) of this Convention."
Romania
"In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention, Romania declares that it establishes its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 2, in all cases referred to in Article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the domestic law."
Russian Federation
The Russian Federation declares that in accordance with paragraph 3 of article 9 of the Convention it has established its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in article 2 of the Convention in cases envisaged in paragraphs 1 and 2 of article 9 of the Convention.
Saudi Arabia
The Secretary-General of the United Nations is hereby notified that the Kingdom has decided to establish the jurisdiction provided for in article 9, paragraph 2 of the Convention.
Slovakia
"Pursuant to article 9, paragraph 3, of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, the Slovak Republic notifies that it has established its jurisdiction in accordance with article 9, paragraph 2, subparagraphs (c), (d) and (e) of the Convention."
Switzerland
In accordance with article 9, paragraph 3, of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, Switzerland hereby declares that it establishes its criminal jurisdiction in respect of the offences set forth in article 2 of the Convention in the cases specified in article 9, paragraph 2 (a), (b), (d) and (e) thereof. With respect to article 9, paragraph 2 (c), jurisdiction is established where the offender is present in Switzerland or is extradited to Switzerland....
Uzbekistan
Paragraph 3 of Article 9 of the Convention:
The Republic of Uzbekistan notifies that it has established jurisdiction over criminal acts recognized under Article 2 of the Convention, in the cases described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 9 of the Convention.
Notifications of designation of administrative or judicial authority in accordance with article 7 paragraph 4 of the Convention (Unless otherwise indicated, the notifications were made upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.)
Participant Sending and Receiving agency
Austria "Bundesamt fur Verfassungsschutz 2 March 2007
und Terrorismusbekampfung (BTV)
(Federal Agency for State Protection
and Counter Terrorism)c/o Federal
Ministry of the Interior, Herrengasse
7A-1014 Vienna, Austria"
Belarus State Security Agency of the 13 March 2007
Republic of Belarus 17, Nezavisimosti
av., 220050 Minsk, Republic of
Belarus, tel: (+375 17) 219 92 21, fax:
(+375 17) 226 00 38 Prosecutor"s
Office of the Republic of Belarus 22,
Internacionalnaya str., 220050.
Minsk, Republic of Belarus tel:
(+375 17) 227 31. fax: (+375 17) 226
42 52 Ministry of the Interior of the
Republic of Belarus 4, Gorodskoy val
str., 220050, Minsk Republic of
Belarus, tel: (+375 17) 218 78 95
Fax: (+375 17) 229 78 40, Ministry for
Emergency Situations of the
Republic of Belarus 5,
Revolucionnaya str., 220050, Minsk,
Republic of Belarus, tel: (+375 17)
203 88 00 Fax: (+375 17) 203 77 81
State Border Guard Committee of
the Republic of Belarus, 24,
Volodarski str., 220050, Minsk,
Republic of Belarus, tel: (+375 17)
206 54 06 fax: (+375 17) 227 70 03,
State Customs Committee of the
Republic of Belarus 45/1
Mogilevskaya str., 220007,
Minsk, Republic of Belarus, tel: 218-
90-00 fax: 218-91-97
Czech Republic POLICE OF THE CZECH 25 July 2006
REPUBLIC, Organized Crime
Detection Unit Arms Traffic Division,
P.O. Box 41 - V215680 Praha 5 -
Zbraslav, Czech Republic, Tel.:
+420974842420, Fax:
+420974842596, e-mail:
v2uuoz@mvcr.cz(24-hour phone
service: - Operations Center:
+420974842690, +420974842694-
Cpt. Pavel Osvald: +420603191064-
Lt.Col. Jan Svoboda:
+420603190355)
Czech Republic Police of the Czech Republic 20 April 2009
Organised Crime Detection Unit
Arms Traffic Division P.O. Box 41 -
V2 156 80 Praha 5 - Zbraslav Czech
Republic Tel.: +420974842420 Fax:
+420974842596 e-mail:
v2uooz@mvcr.cz Operations Center
(24-hour phone service): tel.:
+420974842689, +420974842690,
+420974842694 fax:
+420974842586."
Germany Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) (Federal 1 August 2008
Criminal Police Office) Referat ST 23
(Division ST 23) Paul-Dickopf-Str. 2
D-53340 Meckenheim Federal
Republic of Germany Contactability
during working hours (from 7.30 hrs
to 16.00 hrs on working days):
Referat ST 23 phone: +49 2225 89
22588/-23951; fax: +49 2225 89
45455 email: st23@bka.bund.de
Contactability outside working
hours: Kriminaldauerdienst
(Permanent Criminal Police Service)
Phone: +49 2225 89 22042/-22043;
fax: +49 611 5545424/-5545425
email:
zd11kddmeckenheim@bka.bund.de."
Hungary "International Law Enforcement 13 June 2007
Cooperation Centre, Message
Response and International
Telecommunication Division, Tel: +
36-1-443-5557, Fax: + 36-1-443-
5815, email:
intercom@orfk.police.hu"
Japan "Counter International Terrorism 3 August 2007
Division, Foreign Affairs and
Intelligence Department, Security
Bureau, National Police Agency, tel:
+81-3-3581-0141 (ext. 5961), fax:
+81-3-3591-6919, Public Security
Division, Criminal Affairs Bureau,
Ministry of Justice tel: +81-3-3592-
7059, fax: +81-3-3592-7066,
International Nuclear Cooperation
Division, Disarmament, Non-
Proliferation and Science
Department, Foreign Policy Bureau,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs tel: +81-
3-5501-8227 fax: +81-3-5501-8230,
Nuclear and Industrial Safety
Agency, Ministry of Economy, Trade
and Industry tel: +81-3-3501-1087
fax: +81-3-3580-8460 Technology
and Safety Division, Policy Bureau,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and
Transport, tel: +81-3-5253-8308,
fax: + 81-3-5223-1560"
Latvia Security Police, Kr. Barona Str. 99a, 25 July 2006
Riga, LV-1012, Latvia, Phone: +371
7208964, Fax: +3717273373, E-
mail: dp@dp.gov.lv
Lithuania "State Security Department (SSD) of 19 July 2007
the Republic of Lithuania Vytenio St.
1, LT-2009 Vilnius, Republic of
Lithuania Phone/Fax: (+370 5)
2312602 E-mail: vsd@vsd.lt."
Saudi Arabia "Ministry of the Interior and The
City of King Abdulaziz for Science
and Technology."
Switzerland Central Engagement Department of 15 October 2008
the Federal Police Office,
Nussbaumstrasse 29, CH - 3003
Berne, telephone no. +41 31 322 44
50, fax no. +41 31 322 53 04
Uzbekistan National Security Service of the 29 April 2008
Republic of Uzbekistan
End note
1. With a territorial exclusion in regard to the Faroe Islands and Greenland.
2. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
3. The Secretary-General received from the following States, on the date indicated hereinafter, a communication with regard to the reservation made by Egypt upon signature:
Latvia (6 December 2006):
"The Government of the Republic of Latvia has examined the reservation made by the Arab Republic of Egypt to the International Convention on the Suppression of the Acts of Nuclear Terrorism upon signature to the Convention regarding Article 4.
The Government of the Republic of Latvia is of the opinion that this reservation contradicts to the objectives and purposes of the International Convention to suppress the acts of nuclear terrorism wherever and by whomsoever they may be carried out.
The Government of the Republic of Latvia recalls that customary international law as codified by Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and in particular Article 19 (c), sets out that reservations that are incompatible with the object and purpose of a treaty are not permissible.
The Government of the Republic of Latvia therefore objects to the aforesaid reservation made by the Arab Republic of Egypt to the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism.
However, this objection shall not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between the Republic of Latvia and the Arab Republic of Egypt. Thus, the International Convention will become operative without the Arab Republic of Egypt benefiting from its reservation.
Italy (27 March 2007):
"The Permanent Mission of Italy has the honor to refer to the reservation made by the Arab Republic of Egypt to article 4 of the Convention, which would extend the application of the Convention to include the armed forces of a State when they "violate the rules and principles of international law in the exercise of their duties." Such activities would otherwise be excluded from the Convention by article 4. It is the opinion of Italy that Egypt cannot unilaterally extend the obligations of the other States Parties under the Convention, without their express consent, beyond those set out in the Convention.
Italy wishes to make clear that it does not consent to this expansion of the scope of application of the Convention, and that it does not consider the Egyptian declaration to have any effect on the obligations of Italy under the Convention or on the application of the Convention to the armed forces of Italy.
Italy thus regards the unilateral declaration made by the Government of Egypt as applying only to the obligations of Egypt under the Convention and only to the armed forces of Egypt."
Germany (8 February 2008):
"... [the Federal Republic of Germany makes] the following declaration... with regard to the reservation made by the Arab Republic of Egypt upon signature:
The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany has carefully examined the declaration, described as a reservation, relating to article 4 ["paragraph 2 and paragraph 3"] of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism made by the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt at the time of its ratification of the Convention.
In this declaration the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt declares its commitment to article 4 of the Convention provided that the armed forces of a State do not violate the rules and principles of international law in the exercise of their duties under that article, and also provided that the article is not interpreted as excluding the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict from the scope of application of this Convention on the grounds that the activities of States - under certain legal circumstances - are not considered terrorist activities.
However, article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention states that the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by that law, as well as the activities undertaken by military forces of a State in the exercise of their official duties, inasmuch as they are governed by other rules of international law, are not governed by this Convention. Moreover, and according to article 4, paragraph 3, the provisions of article 4, paragraph 2, shall not be interpreted as condoning or making lawful otherwise unlawful acts, or precluding prosecution under other laws. The declaration by the Arab Republic of Egypt thus aims to broaden the scope of the Convention.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany is of the opinion that the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt is only entitled to make such a declaration unilaterally for its own armed forces, and it interprets the declaration as having binding effect only on armed forces of the Arab Republic of Egypt. In the view of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, such a unilateral declaration cannot apply to the armed forces of other States Parties without their express consent. The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany therefore declares that it does not consent to the Egyptian declaration as so interpreted with regard to any armed forces other than those of the Arab Republic of Egypt, and in particular does not recognize any applicability of the Convention to the armed forces of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany also emphasizes that the declaration by the Arab Republic of Egypt has no effect whatsoever on the Federal Republic of Germany"s obligations as State Party to the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism or on the Convention"s applicability to armed forces of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany regards the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism as entering into force between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Arab Republic of Egypt subject to a unilateral declaration made by the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt, which relates exclusively to the obligations of the Arab Republic of Egypt and to the armed forces of the Arab Republic of Egypt."
4. The Secretary-General received from the following State, on the date indicated hereinafter, a communication with regard to the declaration and reservation made by Turkey upon signature:
Latvia (22 December 2006):
"The Government of the Republic of Latvia has examined the reservation and declaration made by the Republic of Turkey to the International Convention on the Suppression of the Acts of Nuclear Terrorism upon signature to the Convention regarding Article 4 (2).
The Government of the Republic of Latvia is of the opinion that this declaration is in fact unilateral act that is deemed to limit the scope of the Convention and therefore should be regarded as reservation. Thus, this reservation contradicts to the objectives and purposes of the Convention on the suppression the commitment of the acts of nuclear terrorism wherever and by whomsoever they may be carried out.
Moreover, the Government of the Republic of Latvia considers that the reservation named as a declaration conflicts with the terms of Article 4 (1).
Therefore, the Government of the Republic of Latvia is of the opinion that this declaration reservation contradicts to the objectives and purposes of the International Convention to suppress the acts of nuclear terrorism wherever and by whomsoever they might be carried out.
The Government of the Republic of Latvia recalls that customary international law as codified by Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and in particular Article 19 (c), sets out that reservations that are incompatible with the object and purpose of a treaty are not permissible.
The Government of the Republic of Latvia therefore objects to the aforesaid reservation named as declaration made by the Republic of Turkey to the International Convention on the Suppression of the Acts of Nuclear Terrorism.
However, this objection shall not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Turkey. Thus, the International Convention will become operative without the Republic of Turkey benefiting from its reservation."